Skip to content
ICANN72 - ccNSO satisfaction survey
1.
Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the ICANN72 ccNSO Members Meeting?
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
2.
How would you rate the following items?
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Relevance of the presentations
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Relevance of the sessions
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Quality of the presentations
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Information available online prior to the meeting
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing)
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Remote participation arrangements
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
not applicable
Other (please specify)
3.
How would you rate the following ccNSO Members Meeting sessions? As a reminder, consult the agenda here: https://community.icann.org/x/hAEuCg
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
ccNSO governance session | Tue, 26 Oct
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
Q&A Council Candidates | Tue, 26 Oct
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
ccNSO DNS Abuse Session | Wed, 27 Oct
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) | 6 Oct
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) | 7 Oct
excellent
very good
good
fair
poor
I did not attend
Other (please specify)
4.
What aspect(s) of the ccNSO Members Meeting went particularly well?
5.
What aspect(s) of the ccNSO Members Meeting need(s) improvement?
6.
What topics do you like to see addressed at the next ccNSO Members Meeting (ICANN73, March 2022)?
7.
Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns?